{"id":8010,"date":"2022-10-11T09:51:00","date_gmt":"2022-10-11T08:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxpolicy.org.uk\/?p=8010"},"modified":"2024-01-04T19:12:25","modified_gmt":"2024-01-04T19:12:25","slug":"four-infographics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/heacham.neidles.com\/2022\/10\/11\/four-infographics\/","title":{"rendered":"The UK tax system in five infographics, and what we can learn from the fact they are boring"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The chart above shows the composition of the UK tax system – the contribution made by each of the different taxes.1<\/a><\/sup>Sources are here<\/a> for most of the taxes, here<\/a> for local government taxes and here<\/a> for vehicle excise duty (the latter being a forecast, not an outturn)<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n It must have seen dramatic changes over the last forty years:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Not really:2<\/a><\/sup>Thanks to the IFS who did all the work here<\/a> – I just bundled similar taxes together and plotted it<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n Or, over a longer period, and as a % of GDP<\/p>\n\n\n\n Obvious conclusions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n That looks like this:3<\/a><\/sup>Thanks to the OECD for the wonderful global revenue statistics database<\/a>. I just bundled similar taxes together – but had to push the taxes into a smaller number of categories than for the UK-only charts above, or cross-country comparisons became impossible<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n Comparisons are easier if we normalise, and order by the total % of tax collected in income tax and social security\/national insurance:4<\/a><\/sup>I’m bundling employer and employee SS\/NI together, because all the evidence is that, in the long term, employees bear the economic burden of employer labour taxes, i.e. because a business will generally keep its overall labour costs constant as taxes increase, so take-home wages fall (Again, in the long term)<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n What can we conclude from this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n But we shouldn’t exaggerate these differences. There are obvious large variations in total tax as a % of GDP between countries, but it’s remarkable how – aside from a couple of outliers5<\/a><\/sup>Chile!<\/span> – the differences in tax composition between countries is relatively small. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Another way to look at this is to plot the % of tax on the wages of the average worker (i.e. income tax, and employee\/employer’s national insurance only) against the level of state spending in each OECD country:<\/p>\n\n\n\n It’s notable that there’s no country in the world which taxes the average worker less than the UK, but has higher government spending.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We should therefore be sceptical of anyone who claims that we can radically change the balance of taxation and [eliminate corporate tax][tax corporates more and people less][tax land more and everything else less]. International experience suggests our options are limited to fiddling at the margins here and there6<\/a><\/sup>Don’t knock it! -almost everything I write is about fiddling at the margins<\/span> or, more courageously<\/a>, choosing to significantly increase or decrease the size of the state, and therefore decrease or increase most people’s taxes, and the public services they fund. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n
How does it compare with the rest of the OECD?<\/h2>\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n