{"id":6954,"date":"2022-09-20T16:04:15","date_gmt":"2022-09-20T15:04:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxpolicy.org.uk\/?p=6954"},"modified":"2022-10-11T22:23:39","modified_gmt":"2022-10-11T21:23:39","slug":"race","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/heacham.neidles.com\/2022\/09\/20\/race\/","title":{"rendered":"The myth of the corporate tax “race to the bottom”"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
It’s often said there’s been a race to the bottom in corporate tax, with tax competition resulting in corporations paying less and less over the last few decades. The most recent claim was by the IPPR, which I commented on here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These claims are wrong, at least when it comes to the UK: the UK corporate tax rate<\/strong> plummeted over the last 20 years, but the actual tax collected, as a percentage of GDP, stayed broadly the same. See the chart above or the OBR piece here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why? Because a company’s corporate tax liability is the tax rate multiplied by its taxable profit. The UK definition of “taxable profit” – often termed the “tax base” – has expanded over the same period that the rate fell. Either by accident or design, the two effects broadly countered each other.1<\/a><\/sup>With some noise from “incorporation” – sole traders establishing companies to save tax, which tends to reduce income tax\/national insurance and boost corporation tax – but not enough to make a difference to this analysis.<\/span> This means that the average effective tax rate (i.e. tax paid divided by profits) is largely unchanged:2<\/a><\/sup>This comes from the excellent OBR piece<\/a>. Well worth a read<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n