{"id":13058,"date":"2024-01-14T09:12:06","date_gmt":"2024-01-14T09:12:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taxpolicy.org.uk\/?p=13058"},"modified":"2024-01-14T20:38:06","modified_gmt":"2024-01-14T20:38:06","slug":"25more","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/heacham.neidles.com\/2024\/01\/14\/25more\/","title":{"rendered":"Douglas Barrowman: 25 more companies with unlawfully hidden ownership"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

We previously reported that Douglas Barrowman’s companies had unlawfully hidden <\/b>their ownership of PPE Medpro<\/a> and <\/b>the companies holding Barrowman’s Belgravia house<\/a>. We can now identify 25 additional companies where Barrowman’s group has unlawfully failed to disclose the ownership, <\/b><\/em>abetted by what appears to be a rogue company verification agent<\/em><\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Update: the total is actually now 27, thanks to a tip received shortly after we first published)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

The law<\/h2>\n\n\n

There are two separate regimes under which companies are required to report their true owner. <\/p>\n\n\n\n