There’s a Youtube video doing the rounds on Twitter which claims that Muslims don’t have to pay stamp duty when they buy a house. The claim is false, and most likely racist disinformation1Initially I thought it might be an innocent error, but the poster blocked me, and has a history of repulsive racist posts, so it’s reasonably clear he knows he’s lying.
I couldn’t see an explanation of this point on the internet, so thought I’d quickly put one together:
Normal mortgage finance
If I buy a house in a normal way then I pay stamp duty2Technically stamp duty land tax, but most people call it “stamp duty” so I will use that term in this article at 5% (or more). I pay a deposit of say 20% up-front. I borrow 80% from the bank under a mortgage loan, and use that plus the deposit to buy the house. Then over the next 25 years I pay interest, and repay the loan, one small piece at a time. After 25 years the mortgage is repaid and I own the house outright.
I pay stamp duty when I buy the house. Obviously I don’t pay it again when the mortgage ends, and I own the house outright.
Islamic Financing
Observant Muslims believe interest is unethical. But they still need to buy houses. So there are a variety of Islamic finance structures that look very similar to a normal mortgage in cash terms, but where the payments are structured differently.
A common one is “diminishing shared ownership” or “diminishing Musharakah”. I pay cash to buy 20% of the house. The bank buys the other 80%. I pay the bank rent for its share of the house, and over time I pay the bank to buy back the rest of those, one small piece at a time. After 25 years, I own the house outright.
Wouldn’t you know it, the rent and purchase prices add up to be very similar to interest and repayments on a normal mortgage, but almost always more expensive (because it’s more complex, and there’s less competition in the UK Islamic finance world).
But, on the face of it, there are two stamp duty charges. One when I and the bank buy the house. And then another series of charges (or single up-front charge) when I buy the slices. That seems unjust, given that both cases are (economically) the same transaction.
So there are specific tax rules that most treat most3but not all; it’s a difficult area, and surprisingly easy to accidentally end up with a double stamp duty charge Islamic Finance the same as normal mortgage finance. In this case, a specific exemption for the second stamp duty charge, so that people using Islamic Finance (whether they are Muslims or not) pay the same amount of tax as everyone else.
There is a practical difference, which is that in the normal case I pay the stamp duty, and in the Islamic Finance case the bank pays it. The bank of course passes the cost to its customer. Often that is paid out over time, which might look like a better deal than a typical mortgage (where the stamp duty must be paid up-front). But that benefit is more than cancelled out in the higher deposit that’s required for an Islamic Finance product – rarely, if ever, less than 20%, and in the fact that payments overall are considerably higher.
Who uses Islamic Finance?
Payments under an Islamic Finance arrangement are economically similar to those under a normal mortgage loan, but typically significantly higher. In part because the products are complicated and riskier for the bank; in part because the market is much less competitive.
For these reasons, most Muslims don’t use Islamic Finance. About 6% of the British population are Muslim. But Islamic Finance makes up only 0.1% of total UK banking assets.
Non-Muslims absolutely could use Islamic Finance if they wanted to – although, given the increased cost, there’s no reason they would. There were some cases years ago of non-Muslims using Islamic Finance because they thought they’d found a way to escape stamp duty. They were wrong.
Scotland
Land law and mortgages all work differently in Scotland, and there’s Land and Buildings Transaction Tax instead of stamp duty/SDLT. I don’t have expertise on any of this. But my understanding is that the end result is the same: someone buying the house using Islamic Finance is in the same tax position as someone borrowing using a conventional mortgage.
Photo © Andy Beecroft and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence.
-
1Initially I thought it might be an innocent error, but the poster blocked me, and has a history of repulsive racist posts, so it’s reasonably clear he knows he’s lying
-
2Technically stamp duty land tax, but most people call it “stamp duty” so I will use that term in this article
-
3but not all; it’s a difficult area, and surprisingly easy to accidentally end up with a double stamp duty charge
5 responses to “Yes, of course Muslims pay stamp duty when they buy a house”
Its possible that those who were very early adopters of the Diminishing Musharaka (DM) product did in fact pay SDLT twice (which is a far cry from Muslims paying no SDLT at all!) Legislation then came into effect subsequently to ensure a ‘level playing field’ whereby SDLT was only paid once on these transaction.
You refer in your article to a practical difference where the Bank pays the SDLT and receive it over time from the customer, in my experience this is uncommon. Usually customers must supply the SDLT funds + their deposit to the Bank in full upon completion. The Bank uses these funds to make the SDLT payment.
Dan – are you aware that Islamic Finance customers who re-finance their BTL mortgage over to a DM product are being treated unequally by HMRC who have failed to publish clear guidance? Might be something to look into!
Thanks! I am sure you are right.
My piece rather glosses over the complexity of Islamic Finance and the rules. It is I think impossible that SDLT could be escaped. But it is absolutely possible it could apply twice.
I should return to this and update it
Islamic Finance Lawyer here – Yes, we pay SDLT. Via IF Loan, we pay it at the point of submitting the SDLT5 return. No way around it.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/235769/Islamic-law-used-to-dodge-stamp-duty
This news article from the Express seems to believe that this is actually true
It’s a pretty disgraceful article that has a deceptive headline to an interesting story (non-Muslims trying to use Islamic Finance rules to avoid tax; didn’t work)